Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 4 authors, 2011-03-24

RE: [PATCH v2 08/16] mlx4_en: Reporting HW revision in ethtool -i

From: Yevgeny Petrilin <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-24 06:26:29

I will send the patch removing the HW information.

Yevgeny
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:bhutchings@solarflare.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 5:40 AM
To: Yevgeny Petrilin
Cc: davem@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Eugenia Emantayev
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 08/16] mlx4_en: Reporting HW revision in ethtool
-i

On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:10 +0000, Yevgeny Petrilin wrote:
quoted
quoted
This is an abuse of the ethtool_drvinfo::driver field.

Your users can use lspci -v, can't they?
I don't think there is a problem here.
We have always reported the HW model via Ethtool, we just expanded
the information
quoted
we provide.
Our users prefer to see the information in ethtool.
I can provide a patch for David if you won't.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help