RE: [PATCH v2 08/16] mlx4_en: Reporting HW revision in ethtool -i

On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 15:10 +0000, Yevgeny Petrilin wrote:

quoted

This is an abuse of the ethtool_drvinfo::driver field.

Your users can use lspci -v, can't they?

I don't think there is a problem here.
We have always reported the HW model via Ethtool, we just expanded the information
we provide.
Our users prefer to see the information in ethtool.

Do you mean 'we documented ethtool -i as the way to get hardware
identification'?  That would be a bug in your documentation.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.