Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 6 authors, 2010-09-29

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel

From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-15 14:52:41
Also in: kvm, lkml

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 12:10 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another issue is that macvtap can be bound to almost
anything, including e.g. a tap device or a bridge,
which might hang on to skb fragments for unlimited time.
Zero copy TX won't easily work there.
I can imagine either somehow triggering a data copy after the
fact (hard), or detecting such devices and avoiding
zero copy (unfortunate for guest to guest, and drivers
will need tuning).
So far macvtap zero copy patch is limited to lower devices supports high
memory DMA, it doesn't apply to a tap device or a bridge.
quoted
 Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update
issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy?

Thanks
Shirley
I like the fact that the patch is simple. Unfortunately
I suspect it'll stop being simple by the time it's complete :) 
I can make a try. :)

Thanks
Shirley
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help