Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel
From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-15 14:52:41
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-15 14:52:41
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 12:10 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Another issue is that macvtap can be bound to almost anything, including e.g. a tap device or a bridge, which might hang on to skb fragments for unlimited time. Zero copy TX won't easily work there. I can imagine either somehow triggering a data copy after the fact (hard), or detecting such devices and avoiding zero copy (unfortunate for guest to guest, and drivers will need tuning).
So far macvtap zero copy patch is limited to lower devices supports high memory DMA, it doesn't apply to a tap device or a bridge.
quoted
Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy? Thanks ShirleyI like the fact that the patch is simple. Unfortunately I suspect it'll stop being simple by the time it's complete :)
I can make a try. :) Thanks Shirley