Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-09-15 05:18:49
Also in:
kvm, lkml
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2010-09-15 05:18:49
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:36:23PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:01 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I think that you should be able to simply combine the two drivers together, add an ioctl to enable/disable zero copy mode of operation.That could work. But what's the purpose to have two drivers if one driver can handle it? Thanks ShirleyThis was just an idea: I thought it's a good way for people interested in this zero copy thing to combine forces and avoid making the same mistakes, but it's not a must of course.Ok, I will make a simple patch by reusing Xiaohui's some vhost code on handling vhost_add_used_and_signal() to see any performance changes. The interesting thing here when I run 32 instances netperf/netserver I didn't see any issue w/i this patch. Thanks Shirley
Yes, I agree this patch is useful for demo purposes: simple, and shows what kind of performance gains we can expect for TX. -- MST