Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host kernel
From: Shirley Ma <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-15 06:21:31
Also in:
kvm, lkml
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 07:12 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Yes, I agree this patch is useful for demo purposes: simple, and shows what kind of performance gains we can expect for TX.
Any other issue you can see in this patch beside vhost descriptors update? Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy? Thanks Shirley