On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:12:10PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

quoted

Sascha Hauer wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+
+	if (frame->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)
+		dlc |= MB_CNT_RTR;
+
+	writel(dlc, &regs->cantxfg[TX_BUF_ID].can_dlc);
+	writel(can_id, &regs->cantxfg[TX_BUF_ID].can_id);

Are you sure, that this is correct?

Yes, I am sure, at least on my hardware.

Indeed i wonder, if it would make sense to skip the entire struct flexcan_mb
approach and fiddle byte-by-byte inside the registers ...

You'll have to to 32 bit accesses to get it right on little and big
endian.

what we can do is:

writel(can_data[0] << 24 | can_data[1] << 16 | can_data[2] << 8 | can_data[3],
	msg_buf + 0x8);

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |