On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 18:10 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:

First two ones I plan to tackle ASAP. The dynamic_printk() stuff might take
longer and I was wondering if you would be ok with changing that post-29 in
case I were about to miss the merge window (got a few very busy weeks
ahead of me).

Fine with me, I guess, I don't even know if the dynprintk is applicable
(though I'd rather see you make it work if it isn't than add yet another
huge debug macro file :) )

johannes