Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-31 11:11:23
Also in:
lkml
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-31 11:11:23
Also in:
lkml
Ilpo Järvinen a écrit :
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
David Miller a écrit :quoted
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <redacted> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:16 +0200 (EET)quoted
quoted
Let me remind that it is just a single process, so no ping-pong& otherquoted
quoted
lock related cache effects should play any significant role here,no? (I'mquoted
quoted
no expert though :-)). Not locks or ping-pongs perhaps, I guess. So it just sends andreceives over a socket, implementing both ends of the communication in the same process?quoted
If hash chain conflicts do happen for those 2 sockets, justtraversingquoted
the chain 2 entries deep could show up.tbench is very sensible to cache line ping-pongs (on SMP machines of course)...Sorry to disappoint you but we were discussion there on my AIM9 tcp_test results :-).
Well, before you added AIM9 on this topic, we were focusing on tbench :) Sorry to disappoint you :)