Thread (94 messages) 94 messages, 17 authors, 2008-11-04

Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-31 11:11:23
Also in: lkml

Ilpo Järvinen a écrit :
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
David Miller a écrit :
quoted
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:16 +0200 (EET)
quoted
quoted
Let me remind that it is just a single process, so no ping-pong 
& other
quoted
quoted
lock related cache effects should play any significant role here, 
no? (I'm
quoted
quoted
no expert though :-)).
Not locks or ping-pongs perhaps, I guess.  So it just sends and
receives over a socket, implementing both ends of the communication
in the same process?
quoted
If hash chain conflicts do happen for those 2 sockets, just 
traversing
quoted
the chain 2 entries deep could show up.
tbench is very sensible to cache line ping-pongs (on SMP machines of 
course)
...Sorry to disappoint you but we were discussion there on my AIM9 
tcp_test results :-).
Well, before you added AIM9 on this topic, we were focusing on tbench :)

Sorry to disappoint you :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help