Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-26 12:23:22
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- tbench-regression-2.6.27-rc1.png [image/png] 4996 bytes
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-26 12:23:22
Also in:
lkml
Hi.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
vanilla 27: 347.222 no TSO/GSO: 357.331 no hrticks: 382.983 no balance: 389.802Can anyone please tell me if there was any conclusion of this thread?For the reference, just pulled git tree (4403b4 commit): 361.184 and with dirty_ratio set to 50: 361.086 without scheduler domain tuning things are essentially the same: 361.367 So, things are getting worse with time, and previous tunes do not help anymore.
That's the picture, how we go on my hardware: 4 (2 physical, 2 logical hyper-threaded) 32-bit xeons 8gb of ram. We probably can be a little bit better for -rc1 kernel though, if I enable only 4gb via config. Better one time to see than 1000 times to read. One can scare children with our graphs... Picture attached. -- Evgeniy Polyakov