Thread (182 messages) 182 messages, 27 authors, 2008-08-01

Re: Kernel WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1330 __netif_schedule+0x2c/0x98()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2008-07-23 10:58:30
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 10:13 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:50:14AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
....
quoted
definite NAK on using raw spinlock ops...

I'll go look at this multiqueue stuff to see if there is anything to be
done.. David, what would be a good commit to start reading?
....In the case David ever sleeps: I think, the current Linus' git is
good enough (the problem is with netdevice.h: netif_tx_lock()).
Ah, right,...

that takes a whole bunch of locks at once..

Is that really needed? - when I grep for its usage its surprisingly few
drivers using it and even less generic code.

When I look at the mac802.11 code in ieee80211_tx_pending() it looks
like it can do with just one lock at a time, instead of all - but I
might be missing some obvious details.

So I guess my question is, is netif_tx_lock() here to stay, or is the
right fix to convert all those drivers to use __netif_tx_lock() which
locks only a single queue?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help