Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
From: Patrick McHardy <redacted>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:05:57 +0200
quoted
The idea was that NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n enables everything needed
by mainstream distributions and hides the rest. We can certainly
change the default for this option, but that makes NETFILTER_ADVANCED
pretty much useless.
A new feature cannot possibly be used by existing distributions. I
think that's the main gripe.
>
Well, if the feature really is going to be something that a _normal_
netfilter config needs, then it should indeed be turned on.
As I said, I don't know whether its needed, but judging by James'
response, its going to be needed for a regular FC installation.
Its not needed today of course, so the attached patch changes it
to depend on NETFILTER_ADVANCED and removes the default.
However, nothing in the docs imply that at all. Can you explain? Why
should IP_NF_SECURITY be on, and why should a default netfilter table
enable it? And if it should, WHY THE HELL IS IT DOCUMENTED THAT YOU SHOULD
SAY 'N'?
I think I'll just change all the help texts for options having
different defaults with NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n to say "If unsure,
choose the default" to remove the contradictions we'd otherwise
always have.