Re: [PATCH 9/9] fix sparse warnings
From: Stephen Hemminger <hidden>
Date: 2008-01-12 21:12:21
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:16:13 +0100 Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :quoted
Make FIB TRIE go through sparse checker without warnings. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>Hi Stephen While reviewing your patches (and fib code) I had some questions : 1) I was wondering isn't trie_collect_stats() a potential cpu hog (big latency) ? 2) struct tnode layout If tnode->bits is large enough, we allocate a big area of memory but roughly use only first half of it. We could use a better scheme with an extra indirection. For small nodes, we use space right after tnode, but for big nodes, we allocate a power of two set of pages, to exactly match the memory need. 3) 'pos' and 'bits' fields of 'struct tnode' might be converted to plain uchar, instead of 5-bits fields, to reduce complexity for generated code. 4) full_children & empty_children being 'unsigned short', we probably are limited to 2^15 elements, but I could not find this limit enforced somewhere. [FIB]: Reduce text size of net/ipv4/fib_trie.o In struct tnode, we use two fields of 5 bits for 'pos' and 'bits'. Switching to plain 'unsigned char' (8 bits) take the same space because of compiler alignments, and reduce text size by 435 bytes on i386. On i386 : $ size net/ipv4/fib_trie.o.before_patch net/ipv4/fib_trie.o text data bss dec hex filename 13714 4 64 13782 35d6 net/ipv4/fib_trie.o.before 13279 4 64 13347 3423 net/ipv4/fib_trie.o Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
I agree they should not have been bitfields in the first place. -- Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref]