From: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:14:15 -0800

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 23:23:35 +0100
Sam Ravnborg [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Someone will argue that you should use header-y +=
because the file has no conditionals removed by unifdef.

My personal opinion is that we should kill header-y and
I had patches to greatly improve all this but they got 
lost by accident and I have not yet redone them.

	Sam

Someone might add kernel code later...

I doubt it, I'll therefore modify your patch to use
header-y for now.