Re: Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-29 11:59:33
From: Patrick McHardy <hidden>
Date: 2007-06-29 11:59:33
jamal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-28-06 at 21:20 -0700, David Miller wrote:quoted
Each guest gets a unique MAC address. There is a queue per-port that can fill up. What all the drivers like this do right now is stop the queue if any of the per-port queues fill up, and that's why my sunvnet driver does right now as well. We can only thus wakeup the queue when all of the ports have some space.Is a netdevice really the correct construct for the host side? Sounds to me a layer above the netdevice is the way to go. A bridge for example or L3 routing or even simple tc classify/redirection etc. I havent used what has become openvz these days in many years (or played with Erics approach), but if i recall correctly - it used to have a single netdevice per guest on the host. Thats close to what a basic qemu/UML has today. In such a case it is something above netdevices which does the guest selection.
I'm guessing that that wouldn't allow to do unicast filtering for the guests on the real device without hacking the bridge code for this special case. The difference to a real bridge is that the all addresses are completely known in advance, so it doesn't need promiscous mode for learning.