From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:35:56 +0300

From: =?ISO-8859-1?q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= <redacted>

It is easily calculable when needed and user are not that many
after all.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <redacted>

This looks good, but are you absolutely sure we never used
a stale value of tp->left_out on purpose?

I tried to audit this but there are so many cases :-)

What I mean here is, was there a case where we updated
sacked_out or lost_out, but then used left_out before
it was updated, and we were doing this on purpose?