From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 10:58:27 +0300 (EEST)

On Sat, 26 May 2007, David Miller wrote:

quoted

From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <redacted>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 11:35:53 +0300

quoted

Dave, you could consider applying other than the last one if they
seem ok to you too (you'll need to rebase your tcp-2.6 in that case
first to apply cleanly those that touch tcp_sync_left_out :-)).

Absolutely, I'll do the quick rebase of tcp-2.6 and review +
applying of your patches (except the last one) over the weekend.

While you're in the right context (reviewing patch 8), you could also
look if tcp_clean_rtx_queue does a right thing when passing a strange 
pkts_acked to congestion control modules. I wonder if it really should 
ignore GSO the way it does currently... I read some cc module code and 
some was adding it to snd_cwnd_cnt, etc. which is a strong indication 
that GSO should be considered... Also if the head is GSO skb that is not 
completely acked, the loop breaks with pkts_acked being zero, I doubt
that can be correct... 

I rebased tcp-2.6, applied your patches 1-7 (which I'll comment
a bit on tomorrow) and will likely take a look at these issues
wrt. patch 8 tomorrow.