Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 3 authors, 2007-02-22

Re: [RFT] bridge: eliminate port_check workqueue

From: Jarek Poplawski <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-22 08:42:44
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:55:55AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c	2007-02-21 10:22:46.000000000 -0800
+++ bridge/net/bridge/br_if.c	2007-02-21 10:53:25.000000000 -0800
@@ -77,26 +77,15 @@
  * Called from work queue to allow for calling functions that
  * might sleep (such as speed check), and to debounce.
  */
What about this comment?
-static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
+void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_port *p)
Of course my opinion shouldn't matter here, but it looks
like withdrawing (or giving up) to the older way. So I'm
not excited, but I trust there is a reason for this. 

Cheers,
Jarek P.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help