Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-17 04:03:23
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-17 04:03:23
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
Andrew Morton wrote:
Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Testcase: Mount an NBD device as sole swap device and mmap > physical RAM, then loop through touching pages only once.Fix: don't try to swap over the network. Yes, there may be some scenarios where people have no local storage, but it's reasonable to expect anyone who is using Linux as an "enterprise storage platform" to stick a local disk on the thing for swap. That leaves MAP_SHARED, but mm-tracking-shared-dirty-pages.patch will fix that, will it not?
Hi Andrew, What happened to the case where we just fill memory full of dirty file pages backed by a remote disk? Regards, Daniel