Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 10 authors, 2006-08-24

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v4

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2006-08-14 12:52:20
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

Rik van Riel [off-list ref] wrote:
That should not be any problem, since skb's (including cowed ones)
are short lived anyway.  Allocating a little bit more memory is
fine when we have a guarantee that the memory will be freed again
shortly.
I'm not sure about the context the comment applies to, but skb's are
not necessarily short-lived.  For example, they could be queued for
a few seconds for ARP/NDISC and even longer for IPsec SA resolution.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help