Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 10 authors, 2006-08-24

Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core

From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-12 18:09:30
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Sat, 2006-08-12 at 19:54 +0200, Indan Zupancic wrote:
On Sat, August 12, 2006 19:44, Peter Zijlstra said:
quoted
Euhm, right :-) long comes naturaly when I think about quantities op
pages. The adjust_memalloc_reserve() argument is an increment, a delta;
perhaps I should change that to long.
Maybe, but having 16 TB of reserved memory seems plenty for a while.
Oh, for sure, but since it doesn't really matter all that much, I'd
rather go for proper.
quoted
Having them separate would allow ajust_memalloc_reserve() to be used by
other callers too (would need some extra locking).
True, but currently memalloc_reserve isn't used in a sensible way,
or I'm missing something.
Well, I'm somewhat reluctant to stick network related code into mm/, it
seems well separated now.

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help