Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] deadlock prevention core
From: Indan Zupancic <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-12 17:54:53
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Indan Zupancic <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-12 17:54:53
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Sat, August 12, 2006 19:44, Peter Zijlstra said:
Euhm, right :-) long comes naturaly when I think about quantities op pages. The adjust_memalloc_reserve() argument is an increment, a delta; perhaps I should change that to long.
Maybe, but having 16 TB of reserved memory seems plenty for a while.
Having them separate would allow ajust_memalloc_reserve() to be used by other callers too (would need some extra locking).
True, but currently memalloc_reserve isn't used in a sensible way, or I'm missing something. Greetings, Indan