Re: [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting
From: Balbir Singh <hidden>
Date: 2006-03-26 16:43:48
Also in:
lkml
From: Balbir Singh <hidden>
Date: 2006-03-26 16:43:48
Also in:
lkml
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:05:18AM -0500, jamal wrote:
On Sat, 2006-25-03 at 23:52 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:quoted
No, we cannot have both passed. If we pass both a PID and a TGID and then the code returns just the stats for the PID.ok, that clears it then; i think you are ready to go.
Cool! Thanks for all your help and review.
quoted
quoted
Also in regards to the nesting, isnt there a need for nla_nest_cancel in case of failures to add TLVs?I thought about it, but when I looked at the code of genlmsg_cancel() and nla_nest_cancel(). It seemed that genlmsg_cancel() should suffice.If your policy is to never send a message if anything fails, then you are fine. What would be really useful now that you understand this, is if you can help extending/cleaning the document i sent you. Or send me a table of contents of how it would have flowed better for you.
I will start looking at the document and see what changes can be made. I will try and update the document from a genetlink programmers perspective i.e. things to know, avoid, etc.
cheers, jamal
Thanks, Balbir