Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2006-03-26

Re: [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting

From: Balbir Singh <hidden>
Date: 2006-03-26 16:43:48
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 09:05:18AM -0500, jamal wrote:
On Sat, 2006-25-03 at 23:52 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:

quoted
No, we cannot have both passed. If we pass both a PID and a TGID and
then the code returns just the stats for the PID.
ok, that clears it then; i think you are ready to go.
Cool! Thanks for all your help and review.
quoted
quoted
Also in regards to the nesting, isnt there a need for nla_nest_cancel in
case of failures to add TLVs?
I thought about it, but when I looked at the code of genlmsg_cancel()
and nla_nest_cancel().  It seemed that genlmsg_cancel() should
suffice.
If your policy is to never send a message if anything fails, then you
are fine.

What would be really useful now that you understand this, is if you can
help extending/cleaning the document i sent you. Or send me a table of
contents of how it would have flowed better for you.
I will start looking at the document and see what changes can be made.
I will try and update the document from a genetlink programmers perspective
i.e. things to know, avoid, etc.
cheers,
jamal
Thanks,
Balbir 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help