Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2006-03-26

Re: [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting

From: jamal <hidden>
Date: 2006-03-25 01:20:04
Also in: lkml

On Fri, 2006-24-03 at 20:24 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Hmm... Would it be ok to send one message with the following format

1. TLV=TASKSTATS_TYPE_PID
2. TLV=TASKSTATS_TYPE_STATS
3. TLV=TASKSTATS_TYPE_TGID
4. TLV=TASKSTATS_TYPE_STATS

It would still be one message, except that 3 and 4 would be optional.
What do you think?
No, that wont work since #2 and #4 are basically the same TLV. [Recall
that "T" is used to index an array]. Your other alternative is to have
#4 perhaps called TASKSTATS_TGID_STATS and #2 TASKSTATS_PID_STATS
although that would smell a little.
Dont be afraid to do the nest, it will be a little painful initially but
i am sure once you figure it out you will appreciate it.

cheers,
jamal
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help