Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2005-05-02 21:28:19
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:56:46PM +0100, Mark Broadbent wrote:
quoted
If what you wrote above is really correct, this means that Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.sgml contains wrong information:See Documentation/spin-locking.txt line 137, this states that spin_[un]lock() should not be used in IRQ handlers.
Line 137 in my spin-locking.txt is a blank line :) Please quote the exact text. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt