Re: [RFC] TCP congestion schedulers
From: John Heffner <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-29 19:32:33
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:25:56PM -0500, John Heffner wrote:quoted
Is there a canonical benchmark?For the LSM case we saw the problem with running netperf over loopback. It added one or two hooks per packet, but it already made a noticeable difference on IA64 boxes.
The motivation for my question is that I get very unpredictable performance over loopback with UP for all architectures, often varying by more than a factor of two. I haven't really tried to track down the cause, but an important characteristic seems to be that the greater the differential between the CPU utilization of the sender and the receiver, the slower the throughput. (But I'm not sure if there's a causal relation here.) Maybe this is simply scheduler strangeness, since it doesn't seem to be an issue that I've noticed on SMP. Has anyone seen this or know offhand what's going on? The only ia64 I have on which I can boot kernels is a UP box. -John