Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: 2004-09-19 12:02:49
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Besides, for any netlink socket but the first for a process, they'll all have negative pid's which have nothing to do with the real pid. So I really think that the wake_up_process hunk is bogus.
Another reason why this is bogus. Most kernel users of unicast have a send timeout setting of 0. Therefore your wake_up_process() call will never happen when netlink_attachskb is called by the kernel. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt