Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: constify the pte_offset_map_ro_nolock() return value
From: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Date: 2026-08-04 19:23:36
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:22:19PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:quoted
Constify the pte_t * retval from pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(), for which it is already pledged that accesses must be read-only. With it, convert the three treewide users to use const pte_t *. khugepaged passes the result right down to fault code (do_swap_page()). This leads to a complicated set of conditions that, in order to be correct, must not install anything into *vmf->pte. This is not trivial to work around in fault code, and as such just trivially cast to non-const pte_t* in the meantime. The other users are far more trivial and the conversion is equally trivially simple.Ah finally more words! :)
:)
quoted
Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>With comment updated as below and nits addressed, LGTM so: Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>quoted
--- arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++-- include/linux/pgtable.h | 2 +- mm/filemap.c | 2 +- mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +- mm/pgtable-generic.c | 4 ++-- 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c index a9be337be3e4..e29db41b6043 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void assert_pte_locked(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) p4d_t *p4d; pud_t *pud; pmd_t *pmd; - pte_t *pte; + const pte_t *pte; spinlock_t *ptl; if (mm == &init_mm)diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 7fabe6c66b4b..acf5a5e31d34 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h@@ -3885,8 +3885,8 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr) pte_t *pte_offset_map_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, spinlock_t **ptlp); -pte_t *pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, - unsigned long addr, spinlock_t **ptlp); +const pte_t *pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, + unsigned long addr, spinlock_t **ptlp); pte_t *pte_offset_map_rw_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp, spinlock_t **ptlp);diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h index dc418553e57a..dd51e722c535 100644 --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static inline pte_t *__pte_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long address) { return pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address); } -static inline void pte_unmap(pte_t *pte) +static inline void pte_unmap(const pte_t *pte)I was going to question this based on whether the contract holds for CONFIG_HIGHPTE but actually: #define pte_unmap(pte) do { \ kunmap_local((pte)); \ rcu_read_unlock(); \ } while (0) #define kunmap_local(__addr) \ do { \ BUILD_BUG_ON(__same_type((__addr), struct page *)); \ __kunmap_local(__addr); \ } while (0) static inline void __kunmap_local(const void *vaddr) <-- const! { kunmap_local_indexed(vaddr); } So nice (CONFIG_HIGHPTE is going to go away at some point though, right? I hope... :)quoted
{ rcu_read_unlock(); }diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 6afec636881f..af5d3fcd1b05 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c@@ -3490,7 +3490,7 @@ static vm_fault_t filemap_fault_recheck_pte_none(struct vm_fault *vmf) { struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; vm_fault_t ret = 0; - pte_t *ptep; + const pte_t *ptep; /* * We might have COW'ed a pagecache folio and might now have an mlockeddiff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c index b237f6e7662a..09efac93a8c6 100644 --- a/mm/khugepaged.c +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c@@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ static enum scan_result __collapse_huge_page_swapin(struct mm_struct *mm, * Here the ptl is only used to check pte_same() in * do_swap_page(), so readonly version is enough. */ - pte = pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl); + pte = (pte_t *) pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);Hmm yeah this is nasty, but you explain why in the commit message. Could you extend the comment to explain it?
Yep, I'll do it.
quoted
if (!pte) { mmap_read_unlock(mm); result = SCAN_NO_PTE_TABLE;diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c index b91b1a98029c..2cfc6e608ef4 100644 --- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c +++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c@@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ pte_t *__pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp) return NULL; } -pte_t *pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, - unsigned long addr, spinlock_t **ptlp) +const pte_t *pte_offset_map_ro_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,Can pmd be const too?
I was going to say "yes but then pmdp_get() also needs to be constfified" but
actually no, it can't:
pte_t *__pte_offset_map(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdvalp) {
if (unlikely(pmd_bad(pmdval))) {
pmd_clear_bad(pmd);
goto nomap;
}
}
so PTE mapping actually needs to write to the pmdp if the pmd looks bad.
Tricky stuff :)
--
Pedro