Re: [PATCH 0/6] powerpc/spufs: assorted fixes
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-08-03 10:18:49
Also in:
lkml, stable
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026, at 11:59, Junrui Luo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, at 17:51, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:quoted
Patches 1-5 are tagged for stable. 6/6 is deliberately not: it changes the atomicity of multi-element mailbox transfers rather than just adding a check, so it seems better to let it soak in mainline first. Build-tested only. I have no Cell or PS3 hardware, so none of this has been exercised at runtime.These are all reasonable fixes as far as I can tell, but I'm missing information about why you care about spufs. If you used some atomated tooling, please add some reference to what you used.We're working on a paper on LLM-assisted vulnerability research. spufs was just picked at random as one of the modules to look at. The tooling is an agent we developed ourselves. Should we add an Assisted-by tag in v2?
Yes, I think that would help.
Arnd