Re: [PATCH 0/6] powerpc/spufs: assorted fixes

On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, at 17:51, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:

quoted

Patches 1-5 are tagged for stable. 6/6 is deliberately not: it changes the
atomicity of multi-element mailbox transfers rather than just adding a
check, so it seems better to let it soak in mainline first.

Build-tested only. I have no Cell or PS3 hardware, so none of this has
been exercised at runtime.

These are all reasonable fixes as far as I can tell, but I'm missing
information about why you care about spufs. If you used some atomated
tooling, please add some reference to what you used.

       Arnd

Hi Arnd,

We're working on a paper on LLM-assisted vulnerability research. spufs
was just picked at random as one of the modules to look at. The tooling
is an agent we developed ourselves. Should we add an Assisted-by tag in
v2?

Thanks,
Junrui Luo