Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 6 authors, 2025-08-29

Re: [PATCH v2 01/18] arm64: topology: Use __free(put_cpufreq_policy) for policy reference

From: Zihuan Zhang <hidden>
Date: 2025-08-27 08:55:43
Also in: dri-devel, imx, intel-gfx, kvm, linux-acpi, linux-mediatek, linux-omap, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, linux-tegra, lkml

Hi,

在 2025/8/27 16:30, Ben Horgan 写道:
Hi Zihuan,

On 8/27/25 03:31, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
quoted
Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <redacted>
---
  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 5d07ee85bdae..e3cb6d54f35b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -307,17 +307,16 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
  		 */
  		if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
  		    time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
-			struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+			struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
Based on the guidance, in include/linux/cleanup.h, I would expect the
assignment to be done on this line.

"...the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
  * statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
  * function when __free() is used."

The reason I split the assignment into multiple lines is because 
scripts/checkpatch.pl gave a warning about the line being too long.

But if you think a single-line assignment is better, I will modify it 
accordingly.
quoted
  			int ref_cpu;
  
+			policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
  			if (!policy)
  				return -EINVAL;
  
  			if (!cpumask_intersects(policy->related_cpus,
-						housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK))) {
-				cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+						housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK)))
  				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-			}
  
  			for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
  				if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
@@ -329,8 +328,6 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
  					break;
  			}
  
-			cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-
  			if (ref_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
  				/* No alternative to pull info from */
  				return -EAGAIN;
Thanks,

Ben
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help