Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 9 authors, 2025-02-25

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] YAML conversion of several Freescale/PowerPC DT bindings

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-02-10 16:20:06
Also in: dmaengine, imx, linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-ide, linux-pci, linux-spi, linux-watchdog, lkml

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +0000, J. Neuschäfer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:59:35PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
Please don't do this, it just makes it harder to merge things since it
makes it look like there's cross tree merges needed when that's not the
case, complicating merging, and puts the entire series in everyone's
inbox which makes things more noisy.
How should I proceed with this series, in your opinion?
I see potential advantages (less of the issues you describe) and
disadvantages (somewhat harder to track patches) of splitting it up
before sending v3.
I'd rather that at least the SPI stuff were sent separately (well,
ideally what you've done already is fine and it doesn't need a resend at
all).

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help