On 09/02/2025 18:28, J. Neuschäfer wrote:

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:44:59PM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:30:26 +0100, J. Neuschäfer wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

 .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.yaml      | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/lbc.txt        |  43 ------
 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

[...]

quoted

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-0/localbus@f0010100/simple-periph@2,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand']
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/fsl,elbc.example.dtb: /example-1/localbus@e0005000/nand@1,0: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['fsl,mpc8315-fcm-nand', 'fsl,elbc-fcm-nand']

I think this is due to how the patches are ordered in the series.

If that's possible, this should be fixed, e.g.  by re-ordering the patches.

This patch uses fsl,elbc-gpcm-uio and fsl,elbc-fcm-nand in examples, but
comes before the patches that define the corresponding bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof