Re: [PATCH 10/13] powerpc/rtas: improve function information lookups
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-29 07:24:19
On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 18:08 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Andrew Donnellan [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 09:07 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:quoted
Convert rtas_token() to use a lockless binary search on the function table. Fall back to the old behavior for lookups against names that are not known to be RTAS functions, but issue a warning. rtas_token() is for function names; it is not a general facility for accessing arbitrary properties of the /rtas node. All known misuses of rtas_token() have been converted to more appropriate of_ APIs in preceding changes.For in-kernel users, why not go all the way: make rtas_token() static and use it purely for the userspace API,Not sure what userspace API refers to here, can you be more specific? I don't think rtas_token() is exposed to user space.
Right, what I actually meant to refer to here is the fact that sys_rtas takes a token, but when I wrote this I forgot that userspace doesn't pass a string, rather librtas implements rtas_token itself using the /proc interface to the device tree.
quoted
and switch kernel users over to using rtas_function_index directly?Well, I have work in progress to transition all rtas_token() users to a different API, but using opaque symbolic handles rather than exposing the indexes. Something like: /* * Opaque handle for client code to refer to RTAS functions. All valid * function handles are build-time constants prefixed with RTAS_FN_. */ typedef struct { enum rtas_function_index index; } rtas_fn_handle_t; #define rtas_fn_handle(x_) (const rtas_fn_handle_t) { .index = rtas_fnidx(x_), } #define RTAS_FN_CHECK_EXCEPTION rtas_fn_handle(CHECK_EXCEPTION) #define RTAS_FN_DISPLAY_CHARACTER rtas_fn_handle(DISPLAY_CHARACTER) #define RTAS_FN_EVENT_SCAN rtas_fn_handle(EVENT_SCAN) ... /** * rtas_function_token() - RTAS function token lookup. * @handle: Function handle, e.g. RTAS_FN_EVENT_SCAN. * * Context: Any context. * Return: the token value for the function if implemented by this platform, * otherwise RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE. */ s32 rtas_function_token(const rtas_fn_handle_t handle) { const size_t index = handle.index; const bool out_of_bounds = index >= ARRAY_SIZE(rtas_function_table); if (WARN_ONCE(out_of_bounds, "invalid function index %zu", index)) return RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE; return rtas_function_table[index].token; } But that's a tree-wide change that would touch various drivers, and I feel like the current series is what I can reasonably hope to get applied right now.
It's not clear to me what the benefit of adding this additional layer of indirection would be. -- Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra ajd@linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited