On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 09:17:06AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Le 11/06/2022 à 01:35, ira.weiny@intel.com a écrit :
quoted
From: Ira Weiny <redacted>
Now that the pkey arch support is no longer checked in mm_pkey_free()
there is no reason to have it return int.
Right, I see this is doing what I commented in previous patch.
Yes because it was suggested by Sohil I decided to make it a separate patch to
make the credit easier.
quoted
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 41458e729c27..e872bdd2e228 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -809,8 +809,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(pkey_free, int, pkey)
return ret;
mmap_write_lock(current->mm);
- if (mm_pkey_is_allocated(current->mm, pkey))
- ret = mm_pkey_free(current->mm, pkey);
+ if (mm_pkey_is_allocated(current->mm, pkey)) {
+ mm_pkey_free(current->mm, pkey);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
Or you could have ret = 0 by default and do
if (mm_pkey_is_allocated(current->mm, pkey))
mm_pkey_free(current->mm, pkey);
else
ret = -EINVAL;
Yes that fits the kernel style better.
Thanks for the review!
Ira
quoted
mmap_write_unlock(current->mm);
/*