Re: [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: Increase driver logging

On 7/15/20 8:29 PM, David Miller wrote:

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:06:32 -0700

quoted

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:51:55 -0500 Thomas Falcon wrote:

quoted

  	free_netdev(netdev);
  	dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, NULL);
+	netdev_info(netdev, "VNIC client device has been successfully removed.\n");

A step too far, perhaps.

In general this patch looks a little questionable IMHO, this amount of
logging output is not commonly seen in drivers. All the the info
messages are just static text, not even carrying any extra information.
In an era of ftrace, and bpftrace, do we really need this?

Agreed, this is too much.  This is debugging, and thus suitable for tracing
facilities, at best.

Thanks for your feedback. I see now that I was overly aggressive with 
this patch to be sure, but it would help with narrowing down problems at 
a first glance, should they arise. The driver in its current state logs 
very little of what is it doing without the use of additional debugging 
or tracing facilities. Would it be worth it to pursue a less aggressive 
version or would that be dead on arrival? What are acceptable driver 
operations to log at this level?

Thanks,

Tom