Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dma-mapping: Remove dma_check_mask()
flat view
From: Lendacky, Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Date: 2019-07-18 17:29:40
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml
On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from generic code. Christoph Hellwig mentioned that "There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA mask.", so just remove dma_check_mask(). Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- kernel/dma/mapping.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/kernel/dma/mapping.c b/kernel/dma/mapping.c index 1f628e7ac709..61eeefbfcb36 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/mapping.c +++ b/kernel/dma/mapping.c@@ -291,12 +291,6 @@ void dma_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_free_attrs); -static inline void dma_check_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) -{ - if (sme_active() && (mask < (((u64)sme_get_me_mask() << 1) - 1))) - dev_warn(dev, "SME is active, device will require DMA bounce buffers\n"); -} - int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask) { const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);@@ -327,7 +321,6 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) return -EIO; arch_dma_set_mask(dev, mask); - dma_check_mask(dev, mask); *dev->dma_mask = mask; return 0; }@@ -345,7 +338,6 @@ int dma_set_coherent_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask) if (!dma_supported(dev, mask)) return -EIO; - dma_check_mask(dev, mask); dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask; return 0; }