Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 5 authors, 2019-07-19

Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()

flat view

From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Date: 2019-07-18 17:26:12
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-s390, lkml

On 7/17/19 10:28 PM, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from
generic code.

There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so
just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have
different names for similar technology.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 62fa5a82a065..e52401f94e91 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -459,8 +459,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
 		panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer");
 
 	if (mem_encrypt_active())
-		pr_warn_once("%s is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n",
-			     sme_active() ? "SME" : "SEV");
+		pr_warn_once("Memory encryption is active and system is using DMA bounce buffers\n");
 
 	mask = dma_get_seg_boundary(hwdev);
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help