Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function

Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

-/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
-bool sev_active(void)
-{
-	return is_prot_virt_guest();
-}
-
 bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
 {
-	return sev_active();
+	return is_prot_virt_guest();
 }

Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Thank you for your review on al these patches.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center