Hello Nicholas,

On 06/23/2019 03:14 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:

This is a change broken out from the huge vmap vmalloc series as
requested. There is a little bit of dependency juggling across

Thanks for splitting up the previous series and sending this one out.

trees, but patches are pretty trivial. Ideally if Andrew accepts
this patch and queues it up for next, then the arch patches would
be merged through those trees then patch 3 gets sent by Andrew.

Fair enough.

I've tested this with other powerpc and vmalloc patches, with code
that explicitly tests vmalloc_to_page on vmalloced memory and
results look fine.

- Anshuman