Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/tm: Adjust tm_reclaim_thread() parameters
From: Michael Neuling <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-16 11:57:50
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 19:59 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
From: Cyril Bur <redacted>
=20
tm_reclaim_thread() doesn't use the parameter anymore, both callers have
to bother getting it as they have no need for a struct thread_info
either.
=20
It was previously used but became unused in commit
dc3106690b20 ("powerpc: tm: Always use fp_state and vr_state to store liv=e
registers") =20 Just remove it and adjust the callers. =20 Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <redacted> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) =20diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.=
c
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
index 9ef4aea9fffe..f8beee03f00a 100644--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c@@ -866,8 +866,7 @@ static inline bool tm_enabled(struct task_struct *tsk=
)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
return tsk && tsk->thread.regs && (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM); } =20 -static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, - struct thread_info *ti, uint8_t cause) +static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, uint8_t cause) { /* * Use the current MSR TM suspended bit to track if we have@@ -914,7 +913,7 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *t=
hr,
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
void tm_reclaim_current(uint8_t cause) { tm_enable(); - tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, current_thread_info(), cause); + tm_reclaim_thread(¤t->thread, cause); } =20 static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct *tsk)@@ -945,7 +944,7 @@ static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct*tsk) thr->regs->ccr, thr->regs->msr, thr->regs->trap); =20 - tm_reclaim_thread(thr, task_thread_info(tsk), TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); + tm_reclaim_thread(thr, TM_CAUSE_RESCHED); =20 TM_DEBUG("--- tm_reclaim on pid %d complete\n", tsk->pid);