Re: [PATCH v13 15/24] selftests/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-20 15:06:29
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-kselftest, linux-mm
+static inline u32 *siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(siginfo_t *si)
+{
+#ifdef si_pkey
+ return &si->si_pkey;
+#else
+ return (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset);
+#endif
}FWIW, this isn't ppc-specific.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c index f43a319..88dfa40 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c@@ -197,17 +197,18 @@ void dump_mem(void *dumpme, int len_bytes) int pkey_faults; int last_si_pkey = -1; +void pkey_access_allow(int pkey); void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext) { ucontext_t *uctxt = vucontext; int trapno; unsigned long ip; char *fpregs; +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */ pkey_reg_t *pkey_reg_ptr; - u64 siginfo_pkey; +#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */ + u32 siginfo_pkey; u32 *si_pkey_ptr; - int pkey_reg_offset; - fpregset_t fpregset; dprint_in_signal = 1; dprintf1(">>>>===============SIGSEGV============================\n");@@ -217,12 +218,14 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext) trapno = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_TRAPNO]; ip = uctxt->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_IP_IDX]; - fpregset = uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs; - fpregs = (void *)fpregset; + fpregs = (char *) uctxt->uc_mcontext.fpregs; dprintf2("%s() trapno: %d ip: 0x%016lx info->si_code: %s/%d\n", __func__, trapno, ip, si_code_str(si->si_code), si->si_code); + +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */ + #ifdef __i386__ /* * 32-bit has some extra padding so that userspace can tell whether@@ -230,20 +233,28 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext) * state. We just assume that it is here. */ fpregs += 0x70; -#endif - pkey_reg_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset(); - pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_offset]); +#endif /* __i386__ */ - dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si); - dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs); + pkey_reg_ptr = (void *)(&fpregs[pkey_reg_xstate_offset()]); /* - * If we got a PKEY fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in + * If we got a key fault, we *HAVE* to have at least one bit set in * here. */ dprintf1("pkey_reg_xstate_offset: %d\n", pkey_reg_xstate_offset()); if (DEBUG_LEVEL > 4) dump_mem(pkey_reg_ptr - 128, 256); pkey_assert(*pkey_reg_ptr); +#endif /* defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) */
The series up to this point has been looking pretty nice and broken out and easy to read. It goes off the rails a bit here. Adding #ifdefs and..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ dprintf1("siginfo: %p\n", si); + dprintf1(" fpregs: %p\n", fpregs); + + si_pkey_ptr = siginfo_get_pkey_ptr(si); + dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr); + dump_mem(si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24); + siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr; + pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS); + last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey; if ((si->si_code == SEGV_MAPERR) || (si->si_code == SEGV_ACCERR) ||@@ -252,22 +263,21 @@ void signal_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *vucontext) exit(4); } - si_pkey_ptr = (u32 *)(((u8 *)si) + si_pkey_offset); - dprintf1("si_pkey_ptr: %p\n", si_pkey_ptr); - dump_mem((u8 *)si_pkey_ptr - 8, 24); - siginfo_pkey = *si_pkey_ptr; - pkey_assert(siginfo_pkey < NR_PKEYS); - last_si_pkey = siginfo_pkey;
Moving random code around with no explanation.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
- dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from xsave: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n", *pkey_reg_ptr); /* * need __read_pkey_reg() version so we do not do shadow_pkey_reg * checking */ dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from pkey_reg: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n", __read_pkey_reg()); - dprintf1("pkey from siginfo: %jx\n", siginfo_pkey); - *(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr = 0x00000000; +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* arch */ + dprintf1("signal pkey_reg from xsave: "PKEY_REG_FMT"\n", *pkey_reg_ptr); + *(u64 *)pkey_reg_ptr &= clear_pkey_flags(siginfo_pkey, + PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); +#elif __powerpc64__ + pkey_access_allow(siginfo_pkey); +#endif + shadow_pkey_reg &= clear_pkey_flags(siginfo_pkey, + PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE); dprintf1("WARNING: set PKEY_REG=0 to allow faulting instruction " "to continue\n"); pkey_faults++;@@ -1331,9 +1341,8 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey) madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); do_not_expect_pkey_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory"); - ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); - dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); - expected_pkey_fault(pkey); + + expect_fault_on_read_execonly_key(p1, pkey); }
While none of this is a deal-breaker (as I said, I feel like the selftests/ rules are a bit more lax) this does kinda break the illusion of a nice, broken out series. Could you address this a bit in the changelog at least, please?