Thread (92 messages) flat view 92 messages, 6 authors, 2017-07-13

Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma

From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-13 14:07:55
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml

On 07/13/2017 01:03 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:13:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
quoted
On 07/05/2017 02:22 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+void arch_show_smap(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey:  %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
This seems like kinda silly unnecessary duplication.  Could we just put
this in the fs/proc/ code and #ifdef it on ARCH_HAS_PKEYS?
Well x86 predicates it based on availability of X86_FEATURE_OSPKE.

powerpc doesn't need that check or any similar check. So trying to
generalize the code does not save much IMHO.
I know all your hardware doesn't support it. :)

So, for instance, if you are running on a new POWER9 with radix page
tables, you will just always output "ProtectionKey: 0" in every VMA,
regardless?
maybe have a seperate inline function that does
seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey:  %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
and is called from x86 and powerpc's arch_show_smap()?
At least will keep the string format captured in 
one single place.
Now that we have two architectures, is there a strong reason we can't
just have an arch_pkeys_enabled(), and stick the seq_printf() back in
generic code?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help