Thread (92 messages) flat view 92 messages, 6 authors, 2017-07-13

Re: [RFC v5 15/38] powerpc: helper function to read,write AMR,IAMR,UAMOR registers

From: Ram Pai <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-13 07:55:22
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:26:01PM +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
On Wed,  5 Jul 2017 14:21:52 -0700
Ram Pai [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Implements helper functions to read and write the key related
registers; AMR, IAMR, UAMOR.

AMR register tracks the read,write permission of a key
IAMR register tracks the execute permission of a key
UAMOR register enables and disables a key

Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
index 85bc987..435d6a7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
@@ -428,6 +428,66 @@ static inline void huge_ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		pte_update(mm, addr, ptep, 0, _PAGE_PRIVILEGED, 1);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+
+#include <asm/reg.h>
+static inline u64 read_amr(void)
+{
+	return mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
+}
+static inline void write_amr(u64 value)
+{
+	mtspr(SPRN_AMR, value);
+}
+static inline u64 read_iamr(void)
+{
+	return mfspr(SPRN_IAMR);
+}
+static inline void write_iamr(u64 value)
+{
+	mtspr(SPRN_IAMR, value);
+}
+static inline u64 read_uamor(void)
+{
+	return mfspr(SPRN_UAMOR);
+}
+static inline void write_uamor(u64 value)
+{
+	mtspr(SPRN_UAMOR, value);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
+
+static inline u64 read_amr(void)
+{
+	WARN(1, "%s called with MEMORY PROTECTION KEYS disabled\n", __func__);
+	return -1;
+}
Why do we need to have a version here if we are going to WARN(), why not
let the compilation fail if called from outside of CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS?
Is that the intention?
I did not want to stop someone; kernel module for example, from calling
these interfaces from outside the pkey domain.

Either way can be argued to be correct, I suppose.
RP
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help