Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-23

Re: [PATCH v3] kallsyms: add support for relative offsets in kallsyms address table

From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-01-23 13:22:00
Also in: linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:54:44 +0100
Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:
"""
kallsyms: add support for relative offsets in kallsyms address table

Similar to how relative extables are implemented, it is possible to emit
the kallsyms table in such a way that it contains offsets relative to some
anchor point in the kernel image rather than absolute addresses.

On 64-bit architectures, it cuts the size of the kallsyms address table in
half, since offsets between kernel symbols can typically be expressed in 32
bits. This saves several hundreds of kilobytes of permanent .rodata on
average. In addition, the kallsyms address table is no longer subject to
dynamic relocation when CONFIG_RELOCATABLE is in effect, so the relocation
work done after decompression now doesn't have to do relocation updates for
all these values. This saves up to 24 bytes (i.e., the size of a ELF64 RELA
relocation table entry) per value, which easily adds up to a couple of
megabytes of uncompressed __init data on ppc64 or arm64. Even if these
relocation entries typically compress well, the combined size reduction of
2.8 MB uncompressed for a ppc64_defconfig build (of which 2.4 MB is __init
data) results in a ~500 KB space saving in the compressed image.

Since it is useful for some architectures (like x86) to retain the ability
to emit absolute values as well, this patch adds support for both, by
emitting absolute addresses as positive 32-bit values, and addresses
relative to the lowest encountered relative symbol as negative values,
which are subtracted from the runtime address of this base symbol to
produce the actual address.

Support for the above is enabled by default for all architectures except
IA-64, whose symbols are too far apart to capture in this manner.
snip

I still don't get the 2GB limitaiton, because of the 32 bit address
does it imply that modules load with -2GB to +2GB of the kernel base
address of the kallsyms address table?

Balbir Singh.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help