Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-23

Re: [PATCH v3] kallsyms: add support for relative offsets in kallsyms address table

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-01-22 23:34:32
Also in: linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:19:43 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel [off-list ref] wrote:
Similar to how relative extables are implemented, it is possible to emit
the kallsyms table in such a way that it contains offsets relative to some
anchor point in the kernel image rather than absolute addresses. The benefit
is that such table entries are no longer subject to dynamic relocation when
the build time and runtime offsets of the kernel image are different. Also,
on 64-bit architectures, it essentially cuts the size of the address table
in half since offsets can typically be expressed in 32 bits.

Since it is useful for some architectures (like x86) to retain the ability
to emit absolute values as well, this patch adds support for both, by
emitting absolute addresses as positive 32-bit values, and addresses
relative to the lowest encountered relative symbol as negative values, which
are subtracted from the runtime address of this base symbol to produce the
actual address.

Support for the above is enabled by default for all architectures except
IA-64, whose symbols are too far apart to capture in this manner.
scripts/kallsyms.c: In function 'record_relative_base':
scripts/kallsyms.c:744: error: 'ULLONG_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
scripts/kallsyms.c:744: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
scripts/kallsyms.c:744: error: for each function it appears in.)

That's with (ancient) glibc-headers-2.5-3.  It appears that limits.h's
ULLONG_MAX requires "#ifdef __USE_ISOC99".  I'm not sure what's the
correct way of turning this on.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help