Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2016-01-23

Re: [PATCH v3] kallsyms: add support for relative offsets in kallsyms address table

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-01-21 23:20:48
Also in: linux-arch, linux-s390, lkml

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:55:00 -0800 Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
IIUC, this means that the relocation work done after decompression now
doesn't have to do relocation updates for all these values, which
means a smaller relocation table as well.
Makes sense, thanks.  I altered the changelog

: Similar to how relative extables are implemented, it is possible to
: emit the kallsyms table in such a way that it contains offsets relative
: to some anchor point in the kernel image rather than absolute
: addresses.
: 
: The benefit is that such table entries are no longer subject to dynamic
: relocation when the build time so the relocation work done after
: decompression now doesn't have to do relocation updates for all these
: values, which means a smaller relocation table as well.
: 
: Also, the runtime offsets of the kernel image are different.  Also, on
: 64-bit architectures, it essentially cuts the size of the address table
: in half since offsets can typically be expressed in 32 bits.
: 
: Since it is useful for some architectures (like x86) to retain the ability
: to emit absolute values as well, this patch adds support for both, by
: emitting absolute addresses as positive 32-bit values, and addresses
: relative to the lowest encountered relative symbol as negative values,
: which are subtracted from the runtime address of this base symbol to
: produce the actual address.
: 
: Support for the above is enabled by default for all architectures except
: IA-64, whose symbols are too far apart to capture in this manner.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help