Re: [PATCH v2] barriers: introduce smp_mb__release_acquire and update documentation
From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-09 09:51:49
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
Hi Paul, On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:17:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 01:59:38PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:quoted
I thought Paul was talking about something like this case: CPU A CPU B CPU C foo = 1 UNLOCK x LOCK x (RELEASE) bar = 1 ACQUIRE bar = 1 READ_ONCE foo = 0More like this: CPU A CPU B CPU C WRITE_ONCE(foo, 1); UNLOCK x LOCK x r1 = READ_ONCE(bar); WRITE_ONCE(bar, 1); smp_mb(); r2 = READ_ONCE(foo); This can result in r1==0 && r2==0.
Thank you, that is extremely enlightening :)
quoted
I think we need a PPC litmus test illustrating the inter-thread, same lock failure case when smp_mb__after_unlock_lock is not present so that we can reason about this properly. Paul?Please see above. ;-) The corresponding litmus tests are below.
How do people feel about including these in memory-barriers.txt? I find them considerably easier to read than our current kernel code + list of possible orderings + wall of text, but there's a good chance that my brain has been corrupted from staring at this stuff for too long. The only snag is the ppc assembly code, but it's not *too* horrific ;)
PPC lock-2thread-WR-barrier.litmus
""
(*
* Does 3.0 Linux-kernel Power lock-unlock provide local
* barrier that orders prior stores against subsequent loads,
* if the unlock and lock happen on different threads?
* This version uses lwsync instead of isync.
*)
(* 23-July-2013: ppcmem says "Sometimes" *)
{
l=1;
0:r1=1; 0:r4=x; 0:r10=0; 0:r12=l;
1:r1=1; 1:r3=42; 1:r4=x; 1:r5=y; 1:r10=0; 1:r11=0; 1:r12=l;
2:r1=1; 2:r4=x; 2:r5=y;
}
P0 | P1 | P2;
stw r1,0(r4) | lwarx r11,r10,r12 | stw r1,0(r5) ;
lwsync | cmpwi r11,0 | lwsync ;
stw r10,0(r12) | bne Fail1 | lwz r7,0(r4) ;
| stwcx. r1,r10,r12 | ;
| bne Fail1 | ;
| isync | ;
| lwz r3,0(r5) | ;
| Fail1: | ;
exists
(1:r3=0 /\ 2:r7=0)We could also include a link to the ppcmem/herd web frontends and your lwn.net article. (ppcmem is already linked, but it's not obvious that you can run litmus tests in your browser). Will