Thread (31 messages) flat view 31 messages, 7 authors, 2013-06-26

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] powerpc: Add MSR_DE to MSR_KERNEL

From: Joakim Tjernlund <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-02 18:29:46

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:42 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On 06/01/2012 05:30 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
BTW. My point of view is that this whole business about MSR:DE is a HW
design bug. There should be -no- (absolutely 0) interaction between the
SW state and the HW debugger for normal operations unless the user of
the debugger explicitly wants to change some state.
I agree entirely, and e500mc at least has less of this than e500v2 (not
sure if it still needs MSR[DE], but supposedly it doesn't have the
requirement for there to be a valid instruction at the debug vector,
which is lots of fun when booting).  But this isn't exactly something
Freescale is going to replace existing chips over.

Getting all the way to zero interaction would require a completely
separate debug facility so software can debug at the same time.  I'd be
all for that (and let's throw in a third, for the hypervisor), but I'm
not the one that needs to be convinced.
You can find a good compromise. If you have some kind of SPR letting you
know now many DACs and IACs are available, you could essentially
"reserve" some for HW debug with the probe. Not as good as a fully
separate facility but still better than stepping on each other toes.

Things like DBCR should probably still be separated. There's no excuse
for the MSR:DE bullshit tho :-)
hmm, where does this go w.r.t the patch? Got the feeling that the
best thing is to just turn MSR:DE on and be done with it?

 Jocke
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help