Re: [RFC] [PATCH] powerpc: Add MSR_DE to MSR_KERNEL
From: Joakim Tjernlund <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-02 18:29:46
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 17:42 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
On 06/01/2012 05:30 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
BTW. My point of view is that this whole business about MSR:DE is a HW design bug. There should be -no- (absolutely 0) interaction between the SW state and the HW debugger for normal operations unless the user of the debugger explicitly wants to change some state.I agree entirely, and e500mc at least has less of this than e500v2 (not sure if it still needs MSR[DE], but supposedly it doesn't have the requirement for there to be a valid instruction at the debug vector, which is lots of fun when booting). But this isn't exactly something Freescale is going to replace existing chips over. Getting all the way to zero interaction would require a completely separate debug facility so software can debug at the same time. I'd be all for that (and let's throw in a third, for the hypervisor), but I'm not the one that needs to be convinced.You can find a good compromise. If you have some kind of SPR letting you know now many DACs and IACs are available, you could essentially "reserve" some for HW debug with the probe. Not as good as a fully separate facility but still better than stepping on each other toes. Things like DBCR should probably still be separated. There's no excuse for the MSR:DE bullshit tho :-)
hmm, where does this go w.r.t the patch? Got the feeling that the best thing is to just turn MSR:DE on and be done with it? Jocke