On 06/01/2012 04:14 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 09:26 -0400, Bob Cochran wrote:
quoted
I believe that additional patches are required for CodeWarrior to
work
properly (e.g., assembly start up). I think the patches should come
from Freescale. For whatever reason, they include them in their SDK,
but haven't submitted them for inclusion in the mainline.
As a developer on Freescale Power products, I would like to see
Freescale offer up a CodeWarrior patch set, so I don't have to manage
the patches myself when working outside the SDK (i.e., on a more
recent
kernel).
Such patches would have a hard time getting upstream considering that
codewarrior is a commercial product.
It's not really about CodeWarrior -- it's needed for any external debug
on these chips.
Those chips are commercial products too, BTW. :-)
-Scott