Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2012-06-07

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powerpc/85xx: add HOTPLUG_CPU support

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-05 16:16:08
Also in: lkml

On 06/05/2012 06:18 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 11:32:47AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On 06/04/2012 06:04 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On 05/11/2012 06:53 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
quoted
-#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
+#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) || defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
Let's not grow lists like this.  Is there any harm in building it
unconditionally?

-Scott
We need this ifdef. We only set give_timebase/take_timebase
when CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is defined.
If we really need this to be a compile-time decision, make a new symbol
for it, but I really think this should be decided at runtime.  Just
because we have kexec or hotplug support enabled doesn't mean that's
actually what we're doing at the moment.

-Scott
If user does not enable kexec or hotplug, these codes are redundant.
So use CONFIG_KEXEC and CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU to gard them.
My point is that these lists tend to grow and be a maintenance pain.
For small things it's often better to not worry about saving a few
bytes.  For larger things that need to be conditional, define a new
symbol rather than growing ORed lists like this.

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help